Influence of potential burning area on the dynamics of the spread of hazardous factors of fire

 

Shakhov Stanislav

National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9161-1696

 

Melnychenko Andrii

National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7229-6926

 

Soshinskiy Olexandr

National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7921-1294

 

Saveliev Dmytro

National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4310-0437

 

Dement Maksym

National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4975-384X

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52363/2524-0226-2025-42-20

 

Keywords: fire area, potential burning area, fire simulation, Fire Dynamics Simulator

 

Аnnotation

 

The object of the study is the influence of the potential burning area in Fire Dynamics Simula-tor on the values of fire hazardous factors. The main hypothesis is that changes in the potential burn-ing area in Fire Dynamics Simulator affect the rate at which fire hazardous factors reach their critical threshold values. The problem addressed in this study was to obtain scientifically substantiated data on the influence of the potential burning area in Fire Dynamics Simulator on the values of fire haz-ardous factors. The use of the term “potential burning area” is proposed. As a result, data were ob-tained regarding the influence of the potential burning area on the dynamics of the spread of fire hazardous factors. The results show a significant difference in the time required for visibility to reach its critical threshold values at all measuring points along evacuation routes when the potential burn-ing area is 0.5 m² and 6 m². When the potential burning area is 0.5 m², the visibility indicator does not decrease below 7.5 m, whereas at a potential burning area of 6 m² it decreases to 2.2 m. A com-parison was made of the time required for fire hazardous factors to reach their critical threshold val-ues, particularly visibility, for potential burning areas of 0.5 m² and 6 m². The difference in visibility loss at measuring points № 1, 2, 3, and 4 in percentage terms is 18 %, 13 %, 19 %, and 15 %, respec-tively. At measuring points No. 5 and № 6, when the potential burning area is 0.5 m², visibility loss is not recorded at all. In contrast, when the potential burning area is 6 m², the reduction of visibility below 20 m at measuring points № 5 and No. 6 occurs at 216 s and 220 s, respectively. Thus, the po-tential burning area in Fire Dynamics Simulator modeling should be selected in such a way that there is no artificial limitation of the surface over which flames can spread during the total evacua-tion time. Artificial limitation of the potential burning area leads to distortion of the values of fire hazardous factors.

 

References

 

  1. Shakhov, S. M., Vynohradov, S. A., Saveliev, D. I., Karpova, D. I. (2023). Analysis of foreign experience in calculating evacuation time. Emergency Situations: Prevention and Elimination, 7(2), 29–42. doi: 10.31731/2524.2636.2023.7.2.29.42
  2. State Standard of Ukraine. (2019). DSTU 8828:2019. Fire safety. General provisions (with Amendment № 1). Vid. ofits. (Original work published 2018).
  3. Shakhov, S. M., Vynohradov, S. A., Polivanov, O. H., Saveliev, D. I., Mel-nychenko, A. S. (2023). Features of heat release rate modeling methods in Fire Dy-namics Simulator. Problems of Emergency Situations, 1(37), 79–94. doi: 10.52363/2524-0226-2023-37-6
  4. Shakhov, S. M., Melnychenko, A. S., Saveliev, D. I., Dement, M. O., Huz, A. S. (2025). Influence of smoke screens on the level of fire safety of shelters. Problems of Emergency Situations, 2(42), 304–316. doi: 10.52363/2524-0226-2025-42-20
  5. Shakhov, S. M., Vynohradov, S. A., Rybka, E. O., Harbuz, S. V., Osta-pov, K. M. (2023). Features of determining evacuation time of people from buildings in case of fire. Problems of Emergency Situations, 2(38), 53–68. doi: 10.52363/2524-0226-2023-38-4
  6. Li, D. M., Zhu, S. B., Wang, J. H., Zhou, Z. (2018). Research on Fire Safety Evacuation in a University Library in Nanjing. Procedia Engineering, 211, 372–378. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.12.025
  7. Gao, Z., Li, Z., Wei, J., Long, T., Wang, Q., Shu, L. (2020). Study on forest road of fireproof blockade functions based on PyroSim. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 42(9), 51–60. doi: 10.12171/j.1000–1522.20200140
  8. Yanjie, J. (2021). A fire simulation method of urban light rail station hall based on building information model and PyroSim software. Journal of Physics: Con-ference Series, 1903, 012065, 1–7. doi: 10.1088/1742–6596/1903/1/012065
  9. Hui, Z. (2022). Evacuation simulation of large theater based on PyroSim and Pathfinder. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2289, 012017, 1–7. doi: 10.1088/1742–6596/2289/1/012017
  10. Jian, Z. (2020). Fire simulation research on a bus based on PyroSim. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1678, 012100, 1–7. doi: 10.1088/1742–6596/1678/1/012100
  11. Xu, M., Peng, D. (2020). PyroSim-based numerical simulation of fire safety and evacuation behaviour of college buildings. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 10, 293–299. doi: 10.18280/ijsse.100218
  12. Xinfeng, L., Xueqin, Z., Bo, L. (2017). Numerical simulation of dormitory building fire and personnel escape based on PyroSim and Pathfinder. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 40(3), 257–266. doi: 10.1080/02533839.2017.1300072
  13. McGrattan, K., Hostikka, S., Floyd, J., McDermott, R., Vanella, M. (2020). Fire Dynamics Simulator Technical Reference Guide. Volume 1: Mathematical Mod-el. 6th ed. Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 181.

 

Received by the editorial board: 10.03.2026

Accepted for publication: 13.04.2026

Date of publication (release): 31.05.2026