Development of uav complexes for inspection of damaged objects using computer graphics

 

Tоmеnkо Vitalii

National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7139-9141

 

Kovalov Andrii

National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6525-7558

 

Melnyk Ruslan

National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5622-5642

 

Melnyk Olga

National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9671-108X

 

Tоmеnkо Maryna

National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2354-9106

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52363/2524-0226-2026-43-3

 

Keywords: damage, thermal imaging diagnostics, hazard map, integral hazard index, rescuer's route

 

Аnnotation

 

The article substantiates the concept of creating a modular unmanned aerial vehicle complex for remote inspection of damaged buildings and structures in the emergency zone. It is proposed to consider an unmanned aerial vehicle not only as a means of video reconnaissance, but also as a mo-bile platform for non-destructive testing, spatial modeling, gas monitoring, thermal imaging analysis and assessment of the risk of collapse of structural elements. It is substantiated that the effectiveness of such a complex is determined not by a separate sensor, but by the coordinated operation of onboard, ground and wearable modules that provide collection, transmission, processing and visuali-zation of diagnostic information. The complex includes an unmanned aerial vehicle with a static segmented protective shell, a laser scanner for building a three-dimensional model, a color video cam-era, a thermal imaging module, a gas analyzer with a remote gas intake, a short-range navigation and altitude stabilization module, an on-board computing and navigation module, a vibroacoustic module for monitoring the technical condition of structures, LED lighting, a ground communication repeater, and a rescuer's helmet with a navigation module. An integral hazard index of the structural zone is proposed, which takes into account geometric deformations, visual damage, thermal anomalies, vi-broacoustic activity, and gas hazard. The result of using the complex is the formation of a three-dimensional model of the damaged object, a gas map, a hazard map, and a safe rescuer's route. The practical value of the proposed approach is to reduce the time of primary reconnaissance, reduce the risk to personnel, increase the validity of the decisions of the emergency response manager and create an information basis for planning the sequence of clearing the rubble. This approach increases the efficiency and safety of rescue operations.

 

References

 

  1. Colomina, I., Molina, P. (2014). Unmanned aerial systems for photogramme-try and remote sensing: A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 92, 79–97. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.02.013
  2. Nex, F., Remondino, F. (2014). UAV for 3D mapping applications: a review. Applied Geomatics, 6(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s12518-013-0120-x
  3. Ham, Y., Han, K. K., Lin, J. J., Golparvar-Fard, M. (2016). Visual monitor-ing of civil infrastructure systems via camera-equipped Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): a review of related works. Visualization in Engineering, 4, 1, 1–8. doi: 10.1186/s40327-015-0029-z
  4. Kim, H., Lee, J., Ahn, E., Cho, S., Shin, M., Sim, S.-H. (2017). Concrete crack identification using a UAV incorporating hybrid image processing. Sensors, 17(9), 2052, 1–14. doi: 10.3390/s17092052
  5. Aljagoub, D., Na, R., Cheng, C., Shen, Z. (2022). Performance evaluation of uncooled UAV infrared camera in detecting concrete delamination. Infrastructures, 7(12), 163, 1–26. doi: 10.3390/infrastructures7120163
  6. Burgués, J., Marco, S. (2020). Environmental chemical sensing using small drones: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 748, 141172. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141172
  7. Farrar, C. R., Worden, K. (2007). An introduction to structural health moni-toring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 365(1851), 303–315. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2006.1928
  8. Worden, K., Farrar, C. R., Manson, G., Park, G. (2007). The fundamental ax-ioms of structural health monitoring. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathemat-ical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 463(2082), 1639–1664. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2007.1834
  9. Cadena, C., Carlone, L., Carrillo, H., Latif, Y., Scaramuzza, D., Neira, J., Reid, I., & Leonard, J. J. (2016). Past, present, and future of simultaneous localiza-tion and mapping: Toward the robust-perception age. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 32(6), 1309–1332. doi: 10.1109/TRO.2016.2624754
  10. Zeng, Y., Zhang, R., Lim, T. J. (2016). Wireless communications with un-manned aerial vehicles: Opportunities and challenges. IEEE Communications Maga-zine, 54(5), 36–42. doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2016.7470933
  11. Boje, C., Guerriero, A., Kubicki, S., Rezgui, Y. (2020). Towards a semantic construction digital twin: Directions for future research. Automation in Construction, 114, 103179, 1–16. doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103179
  12. Shevchenko, R. How a fiber optic FPV drone works. Reality and technical limitations. Available at: https://wiydrones.com/blog/yak-pracyuye-fpv-dron-na-optovolokni-check-mark-realnist-i-tehnichni-obmezhennya

 

Received by the editorial board: 10.03.2026

Accepted for publication: 13.04.2026

Date of publication (release): 30.05.2026