Kustov, A. Karpov. Sensitivity of explosive materials to the action of electromagnetic fields. C. 4-17.

 

Sensitivity of explosive materials to the action of electromagnetic fields

 

Kustov Maksim Volodumuroovych

National University of Civil Defence of Ukraine

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6960-6399

 

Karpov Artem Andreyovych

National University of Civil Defence of Ukraine

http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9895-1574

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52363/2524-0226-2023-37-1

 

Keywords: explosion, demining of territories, explosive materials, electromagnetic waves, molecular struc-ture, dipole moment, safety of rescuers

 

Аnnotation

 

The analysis was done to define the most common methods of detection and disposal of explosive objects. According to the principle of their operation, the methods were subdivided into 4 classes. It was established that physical methods are the most effective, and most of them are based on the use of electromagnetic waves with various parameters. To define the degree of ef-fect of electromagnetic waves on explosive materials it was reasonable to study their electromag-netic properties. It is shown that the main parameter that quantitatively characterizes the degree of sensitivity of explosive materials to the action of electromagnetic fields is the dipole moment of their molecules. The molecular structure of the most common explosive materials, in particular hexogen, pentaerythritol tetranitrate and trinitrotoluene, tetryl, lead trinitroresorcinate, mercu-ryfulminate and lead azide has been analyzed. It is shown that the molecules of these substances have a two-dimensional structure, while the molecules of hexogen, pentaerythritol tetranitrate, and mercury fulminate are symmetrical. It corresponds to the absence of a dipole moment in such molecules. The dipole moments of asymmetric molecules of trinitrotoluene, tetryl, lead trinitrore-sorcinate, and lead azide were calculated using the method of adding force vectors of dipole moments of interatomic bonds. The calculated data showed that the dipole moments of these sub-stances are significant, so the electromagnetic influence on the activation of these explosive mate-rials cannot be neglected. Partially, the high values of the dipole moments of trinitrotoluene (µ(C7H5N3O6)=2,55 D) and tetryl (µ(C7H5N5O8)=9,27 D) can be explained by an increased num-ber of asymmetric bonds with nitrogen that has a high electronegativity. The obtained data can be used for the development of the safety algorithms to provide a safe work of the rescuers during demining of the territory and when using the devices of an active electromagnetic action in order to prevent the uncontrolled detonation of explosive objects

 

References

 

  1. Barbashyn, V. V., Nazarov, O. O., Ryutin, V. V. (2010). «Osnovy orhanizatsii pirotekhnichnykh robit. Natsionalnyi universytet tsyvilnohozakhystu Ukrainy». Ba-sics of organizing pyrotechnic works. National University of Civil Defenсe of Ukraine, 353. Available at: http://eprints.kname.edu.ua/46622/1/%D0%9D%D0%9F%D0%9E%
  2. D0%9E%D0%9F%D0%A0.pdf
  3. Prem, M., Purroy, M. E., Vargas, J. F. (2022). Landmines: The local effects of demining. Available at: http://tse-fr.eu/pub/126623
  4. Dorn, A. W. (2019). Eliminating Hidden Killers: How Can Technology Help Humanitarian Demining? Stability: International Journal of Security and Develop-ment, 8(1), 5. doi: 10.5334/sta.743
  5. Cardona, L., Jiménez, J., Vanegas, N. (2014). Landmine detection technologies to face the demining problem in Antioquia. Dyna, 81(183), 115–125. doi: 10.15446/dyna.v81n183.37441
  6. Sato, M., Kikuta, K., Chemyak, I. (2018). Dual Sensor “ALlS” for Humanitari-an Demining. In 2018 17th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Ra-dar (GPR), 1–4. doi: 10.1109/ICGPR.2018.8441662
  7. Schultz, G. M., Keranen, J., Miller, J. S., Shubitidze, F. (2014). Acquisition and processing of advanced sensor data for ERW and UXO detection and classification. In Detection and Sensing of Mines, Explosive Objects, and Obscured Targets XIX, 9072, 112–120. doi: 10.1117/12.2050876
  8. Yinon, J. (2002). Field detection and monitoring of explosives. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 21(4), 292–301. doi: 10.1016/S0165-9936(02)00408-9
  9. Habib, M. K. (2007). Humanitarian demining: reality and the challenge of technology–the state of the arts. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 4(2), 19. doi: 10.5772/5699
  10. Pakhnуts, I., Khrustalova, S., Khrustalev, K. (2022). System for detection and identification of potentially explosive objects in open area. Innovative Technologies and Scientific Solutions for Industries, 2(20), 106–112. doi: 10.30837/ITSSI.2022.20.106
  11. Montes, H., Mena, L., Fernández, R., Sarria, J., Armada, M. (2016). Inspection platform for applications in humanitarian demining. In Assistive Robotics: Proceed-ings of the 18th International Conference on CLAWAR 2015, 446–453. doi: 10.1142/9789814725248_0055
  12. De Cubber, G., Balta, H., Lietart, C. (2014). Teodor: A semi-autonomous search and rescue and demining robot. In Applied Mechanics and Materials, 658, 599–605. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.658.599
  13. Akmalov, A. E., Chistyakov, A. A., Dubkova, O. I., Kotkovskii, G. E., Spitsyn, E. M., Buzinov, N. M. (2016, October). Laser desorption of explosives traces at ambi-ent conditions. In Optics and Photonics for Counterterrorism, Crime Fighting, and De-fence XII, 9995, 110–116. doi: 10.1117/12.2241813
  14. Bielecki, Z., Janucki, J., Kawalec, A., Mikołajczyk, J., Pałka, N., Paster-nak, M., Stacewicz, T. (2012). Sensors and systems for the detection of explosive de-vices-an overview. Metrology and Measurement Systems, 19(1), 3–28. doi: 10.2478/v10178-012-0001-3
  15. Cousins, T., Jones, T., Brisson, J., McFee, J., Jamieson, T., Waller, E., Sel-kirk, E. (1998). The development of a thermal neutron activation (TNA) system as a confirmatory non-metallic land mine detector. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 235(1–2), 53–58. doi: 10.1007/bf02385937
  16. Buryakov, I. (2011). Detection of explosives by ion mobility spectrome-try. Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 66(8). doi: 10.1134/S1061934811080077
  17. Kagan, A. (2022). Counterterrorist detection techniques of explosives by va-por sensors (handheld). In Counterterrorist Detection Techniques of Explosives, 235–251. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64104-5.00012-6
  18. Clifford, E. T., Ing, H., McFee, J. E., Cousins, T. (1999, October). High rate counting electronics for a thermal neutron analysis land mine detector. In Penetrating Radiation Systems and Applications, 3769, 155–166. doi: 10.1117/12.363677
  19. Ishchenko, A. V., Kobets, M. V. (2005). «Zasoby i metody vyiavlennia vy-bukhovykh rechovyn ta prystroiv u borotbi z teroryzmom. Natsionalna akademiiavnu-trishnikhspravUkrainy». Means and methods of detecting explosive substances and devices in the fight against terrorism. National Academy of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, 148. Available at: http://elar.naiau.kiev.ua/bitstream/123456789/18996/1/Kobets%20M.V.%20Zasoby%20i%20metody%20vyaiyvlenaiy%20VP.pdf
  • You are here:  
  • Home
  • Archive
  • EN_cat
  • Kustov, A. Karpov. Sensitivity of explosive materials to the action of electromagnetic fields. C. 4-17.