I. Solovyov, М. Hrytsaienko, V. Strelets, А. Myroshnychenko. Two-stage porivational analysis of models of pidwater pidyom of vibuchonosafe objects. C. 219-237.

 

Two-stage porivational analysis of models of pidwater pidyom of vibuchonosafe objects

 

Ihor Solovyov

National University of Civil Defenсe of Ukraine

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0400-6704

 

Maksym Hrytsaienko

State Emergency Service of Ukraine

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4436-9382

 

Valery Strelets

Humanitarian Organization The Halo Trust

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1913-7878

 

Anton Myroshnychenko

National University of Civil Defenсe of Ukraine

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5104-0657

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52363/2524-0226-2023-37-16

 

Keywords: humanitarian underwater demining, diver-sapper, lifting, multifactorial models, specialized devices

 

Аnnotation

 

A method of multifactorial analysis of models of humanitarian underwater demining has been developed. It provides for the implementation of feedback in the existing methodology for substantiating operational and technical recommendations for reducing the time of humanitarian underwater demining by sapper divers by means of a two-stage (first in natural, and then in coded variables) comparison of multifactor models that describe various options for humanitarian underwater demining. This is due to the fact that an important and unresolved part of the problem of increasing the effectiveness of prevention of emergency situations related to the underwater location of explosive objects is the lack of a scientifically based approach to the multifactorial analysis of various methods of underwater humanitarian demining. The method is considered on the example of a two-stage comparative analysis of multi-factor models of underwater lifting of explosive objects by divers-sappers of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine by using a generally accepted approach and in the case of using a specialized device in the form of a rectangular "basket" with rigid ribs measuring 600x600x150 mm, which was made at the State Emergency Service Department of Ukraine in Kherson region. Multivariate analysis of the existing and new models confirmed that the use of a specialized technical device for lifting an explosive object by sapper divers significantly (with a significance level of a=0,05) affects the time of underwater humanitarian demining. In addition, with the level of significance of two-sided risk a=0,01 in both cases, it can be said that only the level of preparedness and the conditions of underwater demining affect the time of lifting an explosive object by the personnel of the State Emergency Service.

 

References

 

  1. Huet, C., Mastroddi, F. (2016). Autonomy for underwater robots. European perspective. Auton Robot, 40, 1113–1118. doi: 10.1007/s10514-016-9605-x
  2. Cooper, N., Cooke, S., Burgess, K., Business, R. (2018). Dealing with Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) in the Marine Environment. Coasts, Marine Structures and Breakwaters. Published Online: August 21, 2018. doi: 10.1680/cmsb.63174.0157
  3. Mijajlovic, V. (2013). The Regional Center for Divers Training and Underwater Demining. The Journal of ERW and Mine Action. 17(2/13). Available at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cisr-journal/vol17/iss2/13
  4. Miller, Gunnar. (2011). From a DC-3 to BOSB: The Road to a Breakthrough in Military Safety Measures Against the Risks of Historic, Explosive Ordnance. Marine Technology Society Journal, Volume 45, Number 6, November/December 2011, 9, 26–34. doi: 10.4031/MTSJ.45.6.1
  5. IMAS 09.60:2014, IDT. Underwater Survey and Clearance of Explosive Ordnance (EO). Available at: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/mineactionstandards.org_fileadmin_MAS_documents_imas-international-standards_english_series-9_IMAS_09.60_Underwater_Survey_and_Clearance_of_Explosive_Ordnance__EO_.pdf
  6. Standard Operating Procedures for Humanitarian Underwater Demining in South Eastern Europe. Available at: https://old.mineactionstandards.org/
    fileadmin/MAS/documents/references-publications/Humanitarian-Underwater-Demining-in-South-Eastern-Europe.pdf
  7. Mareike, K., Eefke, M., Uwe, W., Jens, G. (2020). Exploration of the munition dumpsite KolbergerHeide in Kiel Bay, Germany: Example for a standardized hydro acoustic and optic monitoring approach. Continental Shelf Research, 198, 104108. doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2020.104108
  8. Kotsyuruba, V., Tsybulia, S., Rybalko, V. (2019). Obgruntuvannya dotsilʹnosti vykorystannya sposobu povitryanoyi rozvidky rayoniv intensyvnoho zastosuvannya minnoyi zbroyi [Justification of the using of the method of air reconnaissance of area of intensive application of mine weapons]. Social development & Security, 9 (1), 60–68. doi: 10.33445/sds.2019.9.1.5 [in Ukrainian]
  9. Sayle, S., Windeyer, T., Charles, M., Conrod, S., Stephenson, M.(2009). Site Assessment and Risk Management Framework for Underwater Munitions. Marine Technology Society Journal, 43(4), 41–51. doi: 10.4031/MTSJ.43.4.10
  10. Mijajlovic, V. (2013). The Regional Center for Divers Training and Underwater Demining. The Journal of ERW and Mine Action : 17(2/13). Available at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cisr-journal/vol17/iss2/13
  11. Humanitarian Demining, Geneva International Centre for, "A Guide to Survey and Clearance of Underwater Explosive Ordnance" (2016). Global CWD Repository, 1326. Available at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cisr-globalcwd/1326
  12. Marco, W., Irwin, L. (2013). Training to Become Cambodia's First Underwater Deminers. The World (Arts, Culture & Media). March 07, 12:40 PM CST. Available at: https://www.pri.org/stories/2013-03-07/training-become-cambodias-first-underwater-deminers
  13. Hrytsaienko, M. (2017). Development of the information platform model for the neutralization of potentially dangerous underwater objects. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 2(2(40), 57–62. doi: 10.15587/2312-8372.2018.129208
  14. Tellez, O., Borghgraef, A., Mersch, E. (August 30th 2017). The Special Case of Sea Mines, Mine Action. The Research Experience of the Royal Military Academy of Belgium, Charles Beumier, Damien Closson, VincianeLacroix, Nada Milisavljevic and YannYvinec, Intech Open, doi: 10.5772/66994
  15. International Symposium Mine Action 2019 8th to 11th April 2019, Slano, Croatia. Available at: http://www.ctro.hr/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Knjiga-za-web-4-mb.pdf
  16. Strelec, V. (2001). Imitacionnyj analiz sistemy «chelovek-mashina» kak metod ergonomicheskoj ocenki funkcionirovaniya avarijnyh sluzhb. Nauchno-tehnicheskij zhurnal: Radioelektronika iinformatika, 3(16), Harkov: HNTURE, 125–128. Available at: http://repositsc.nuczu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/1944/1/%d0%a1%d0%98%d0%90.pdf
  17. Soloviev, I. (2021). Mathematical model of underwater demining by divers of the SESU. Municipal Economy of Cities, 6(166), 175–183. doi: 10.33042/2522-1809-2021-6-166-175-183
  18. Soloviov, I., Strelets, V.&Lovin, D. (2021). Multifactor model of excavation of an explosive subject diver. Problems of Emergency Situations, 2(34), 272–394. doi: 10.52363/2524-0226-2021-34-20
  19. Soloviov, I., Strelets, V., Blyashenko, O., Servatyuk, V. &Pruskyi, A. (2022). Methodology for substantiating operational and technical recommendations on reducing the time of underwater demining by divers-sappers of the State emergency service of Ukraine. Scientific bulletin: Civil protection and fire safety, 2(14), 108–121. doi: 33269/nvcz.2022.2(14).108-121
  20. Voznesenskij, V. (1981). Statisticheskie metody planirovaniya eksperimenta v tehniko-ekonomicheskih issledovaniyah [Statistical methods of experiment planning in feasibility studies]. – Finansy i statistika
  21. Mitropolskij, A. (1971). Tehnika statisticheskih vychislenij [Statistical Computing Technique] – Glavnaya redakciya fiziko-matematicheskoj literaturyizdatelstva «Nauka»
  • You are here:  
  • Home
  • Archive
  • EN_cat
  • I. Solovyov, М. Hrytsaienko, V. Strelets, А. Myroshnychenko. Two-stage porivational analysis of models of pidwater pidyom of vibuchonosafe objects. C. 219-237.