Scientific Journal Problems of Emergency Situations - B. Tsymbal, A. Petryshchev, Yu. Dreval, O. Malko, O. Sharovatova, J. Veretennikova Improvement of the level of labour safety during hostilities. P.325-348.

The dynamics of changes in the number of accidents and victims at work, which occurred during the performance of labour duties and are related to the conduct of hostilities, is investigated. The statistical data on the intensity of the increase in the number of accidents and injuries at work that occurred during the performance of labour duties and are related to the conduct of hostilities in Ukraine are analysed. The ranking of the number of people affected by sectors of the economy in Ukraine is presented, the largest number of which was in transport, warehousing, postal and courier activities; during the supply of electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning; in public administration and defence; compulsory social insurance; wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles, etc. The forecast of the increase in the number of victims of hostilities compared to the beginning of June 2023 and the beginning of May 2022 is provided. The individual probability of suffering from an accident at work and the occupational risk of death as a result of hostilities were determined and their intensive increase was predicted. The matrix criteria are presented for a more accurate assessment of occupational risks of civilian workers, taking into account all the consequences that may occur during hostilities and the frequency of military danger. The improved methodology for assessing occupational risks caused by hostilities was tested at LLC Kharkiv Dairy, at the workplaces. Using a matrix to assess the magnitude of occupational risks caused by hostilities and the risks of employees directly involved in the implementation of the technological process of milk processing were determined. To improve the level of occupational safety during hostilities, measures were developed to manage occupational risks.

References

April 28 is the Day of Occupational Safety in Ukraine – Ukrainian Community – official site. https://ukrainska-gromada.gov.ua/community/28-kvitnya-v-ukrayini-vidznachayetsya-den-ohorony-praczi.html
Liwang, H., Ericson, M., Bang, M. (2014). An Examination of the Implementation of Risk Based Approaches in Military Operations. Journal of Military Studies, 5. doi: https://doi.org/1515/jms-2016-0189
Tsymbal, B., Shapovalov, D., Shapovalov, M., Dreval Yu., Petryshchev A. (2020). Improving the level of occupational safety and improving the methodology of the International Labour Organization for the assessment of occupational risks. Social development and Security, 10, 46–63 doi: https://doi.org/33445/sds.2020.10.2.6
Tsymbal, B., Petryshchev, A. (2022). Features of labour protection during hostilities. Problems of Emergencies: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, 233– Available at: http://pesconf.nuczu.edu.ua/images/
2022/_PES2022_ FINISH190522.pdf
Safety guide for journalists: a handbook for reporters in high-risk environments (2017). Paris, 145. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243986
Shepherd, L. (2016). Making war safe for women? National Action Plans and the militarisation of the Women, Peace and Security agenda. International Political Science Review, 37(3), 324–335. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512116629820
Kravchuk, V. , Shchepankov, S. М., Shepitko, K. V., Pashkovsky, S. M. (2021). Hygienic characteristics of the specific conditions in modern military pilots’ professional activities. World of medicine and biology, 1(75), 90-95. doi: https://doi.org/10.26724/2079-8334-2021-1-75-90-95
Kuronen, P., Toppila, E., Starck, J., Pa A Kko Nen, R., Sorri, M.J. (2004). Modelling the risk of noise-induced hearing loss among military pilots. Int J Audiol, 43(2), 79-84. doi: https://doi.org/1080/14992020400050013. PMID: 28793844
Vasilescu, G. , Kovacs, A., Csaszar, T. A., Baciu, C. R., Baciu, R. E., Georgescu, I.S. (2016). Innovative method for the evaluation of professional risk during controlled demolition with explosives of civil use, Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 15, 2109-2117. doi: https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2016.227
Cioara, C., Morar, M., Babut, A., Miclea, O., Pasculescu V. (2020). Technological and organizational operationalization of the program testing the operation of pyrotechnic entertainment articles of category 4, such as: aerial bombs and roman candles, 9th International Symposium on Occupational Health and Safety (SESAM 2019), 305, 7. doi: https://doi.org/1051/matecconf/202030500074
Kaplan R. , Chukwura C. L., Gorman G. H., Lee V. S., Good C. B., MartinK. L., Ator G. A., Parkinson M. D. (2022). A Career Life-Cycle Perspective on Women's Health and Safety: Insights From the Defense Health Board Report on Military Women's Health. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 64(4), 267–270. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002504
Hosseinpourfard, M. , Rafati, H., Mahmoodi, S. A. R., Asghari, B., Pakroshan, B., Babaei, M. (2012). Effective factors on job stress in military personnel. Journal of Military Medicine, 14, 163–167. Available at: http://surl.li/ejkif
Rabelo, V. , Holland, K. J., Cortina, L. M. (2019). From distrust to distress: Associations among military sexual assault, organizational trust, and occupational health. Psychology of Violence, 9(1), 78–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000166
Greeves, J. (2015). Physiological Implications, Performance Assessment and Risk Mitigation Strategies of Women in Combat-Centric Occupations. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 29, 94–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.
0000000000001116
Peleg, M. , Richter, E. D. (2018). Radio frequency radiation-related cancer: assessing causation in the occupational/military setting. Environ Res, 163, 123–133. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.003
Grier, W., Abbas. H., Gebeyehu, R. , Singh, A. K., Ruiz, J., Hines. S., Alghanim, F., Deepak. J. (2022). Military exposures and lung cancer in United States veterans. Semin Oncol, 49, 241–247. doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.
2022.06.010
Biyikli, Omer, Aydogan, Emel. (2016). A New Model Suggestion to Estimate the Probability Value in Occupational Health and Safety Risk Assessment. Applied Mathematics and Information Sciences, 10, 663– doi: https://doi.org/10.18576/
amis/100226
Bradburne, C., Lewis, J. (2017). Personalizing Environmental Health: At the Intersection of Precision Medicine and Occupational Health in the Military. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 59, 11, 209–214. doi: https://doi.org/
10.1097/JOM.0000000000001116
Crispim, J., Fernandes, J., Rego, N. (2020). Customized risk assessment in military shipbuilding. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 197. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.106809
Reinhold, K., Jarvis, M., Tint, P. (2015). Practical tool and procedure for workplace risk assessment: Evidence from SMEs in Estonia. Safety Science, 71, 282– doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.09.016
Fox, M. , Spicer, K., Chosewood, L. C., Susi, P., Johns, D. O., Dotson, G.S. (2018). Implications of applying cumulative risk assessment to the workplace. Environ Int, 115, 230–238. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.03.026
Burzoni, S., Duquenne, P., Mater, G., Ferrari, L. (2020). Workplace Biological Risk Assessment: Review of Existing and Description of a Comprehensive Approach. Atmosphere, 11, 741. doi: https://doi.org/3390/atmos11070741
Moncada, S., Utzet, M., Molinero, E., Llorens, C., Moreno N., Galtes, A., Navarro, A. (2014). The copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire II (COPSOQ II) in Spain-a tool for psychosocial risk assessment at the workplace. Am J Ind Med., 57, 1, 97– doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22238
Anyfantis, I., Leka, S., Reniers, G., Boustras, G. (2021). Employers perceived importance and the use (or non-use) of workplace risk assessment in micro-sized and small enterprises in Europe with focus on Cyprus. Safety Science, 139, doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105256
Karimi, A., Jamshidi, S., Eslamizad, S. (2014). Designing SQCRA as a Software to Semi-quantitative Chemical Risk Assessment in Workplace, 1(2), 47– Available at: http://johe.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-49-en.html
Tsukada, T., Sakakibara, H. (2016). Risk assessment of fall-related occupational accidents in the workplace. J Occup Health, 58(6), 612– doi: https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.16-0055-OA
Hrymak, V., Devries, J. (2020). The Development and Trial of Systematic Visual Search: a visual inspection method designed to improve current workplace risk assessment practice. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 18(1). doi: https://doi.org/1080/14773996.2019.1708615
Mufti, D., Ikhsan, A., Putri, T. (2019). Workplace Ergonomic Risk Assessment Toward Small-Scale Household Business. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 528 012013. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/
528/1/012013
Saedpanah, K., Motamedzade, M., Salimi, K., Eskandari, T., Samaei, S. (2018). Physical Risk Factors among Construction Workers by Workplace Ergonomic Risk Assessment (WERA) Method. AOH, 2(1), 56–62. Available at: http://aoh.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-56-en.html
Predko, V., Mishenina, O., Strilets, M. (2014). Determination of the limits of application of existing methods for calculating occupational risk. Problems of emergencies, 19, 98– Available at: http://surl.li/ejmgq